Journal Name: International Journal of Food and Bioscience
Article Type: Editorial
Received date: 21st-November-2017
Accepted date: 27th-December-2017
Published date: 03rd-January-2018
Citation: Mastanjevic K, sarkanj B, Krstanovic V, Mastanjevic K (2017) Taking cereals seriously. Futre Rech Food Prossing Tech 1: 1 (01-03).
Copyright: © 2017 Kristina Mastanjevic, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
It is Editorial Type Aticle so it has no Abstrat, kindly go through FullText
Keywords
Cereals; Mycotoxins; Malting; Brewing
Cereals
Cereals such as wheat and barley have always been a valuable source of food, for humans and animals. Wheat is mostly used as a raw material for the baking industry, although malting and brewing industries take up a significant portion of cereals production. These cereals are very sensible towards Fusarium infections of cereals intended for malting. Wheat and barley intended for malting have to fulfil strict limits and recommendations on the quality of raw material used for malting and brewing. Some of the main quality parameters for malt are: protein content, β-glucan content, Kolbach index, malt extract, extract difference, saccharification time, wort colour, viscosity, FAN (free amino nitrogen) etc. [1]. Protein content is one of the most important parameters and the ideal range is between 11 - 12% [2]. Protein content higher than 12% results in heighten soluble proteins content in wort, releasing undesirable flavours in final beer. On the other hand, lower protein content is correlated with low carbohydrate levels, lower extract values [3], and may adversely affect the fermentation due to the poor amino acid content available for yeast nutrition.
Fusarium infections seriously degrade and lower the quality of malting and brewing cereals, such as wheat and barley [4]. This causes economic losses for malting and brewing companies and significantly lowers the quality of malt and beer. Fusarium fungi produce mycotoxins, compounds that are toxic for humans and animals, causing nephropathy, infertility, cancer or death [5]. Some of the mycotoxins, mainly belonging to group of trichotecenes (deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, etc.), are considered important in barley-to-beer-chain (due to their water-soluble properties) and are regularly monitored prior cereals entrance to malting industry. The special attention is given to the masked mycotoxins that occurr in beer in much higher concentrations and ratios than in other food [6]. There are other important mycotoxins in malt-beer chain that receive special attention: aflatoxins, fumonisins, ochratoxin A and zearalenone [7-9]. However, every day new and new analytical methods are being developed that detect and quantify very low concentrations of new mycotoxins in different foodstuffs [10]. The data base of mycotoxins is getting bigger and health safety regulations are very slow in updating new compounds. This arises the problem of emerging mycotoxins whose concentration limits are not being regulated accordingly to the new findings. Malt and beer are continuously monitored for mycotoxins and numerous scientific and professional papers have been written on this subject but there is still no regulation on mycotoxins in these foodstuffs.
Malting and brewing by-products (germ/rootlets, spent grains, spent yeast) can also be contaminated with mycotoxins and represent a serious threat to animal and human health [11,12]. They represent low-cost and nutritious, high-in-fibre animal food [13] and can also be utilized in food industries, primarily baking industry, as to improve sensorial and nutritional properties [14,15].
Clear limits, regular and mandatory controls of mycotoxins in malt and beer should be set, especially since beer is a popular recreational drink and new craft and home-breweries are gaining on popularity. Also due to high possible levels of deoxynivalenol in beer the PMTDI levels can be exceeded by drinking only 1 L of beer [16,17] and this should be taken in to consideration when preparing new limits for mycotoxins in raw materials, final products and by-products.
Keywords
Cereals; Mycotoxins; Malting; Brewing
Krstanović V, Lalić A, Kosović I, Velić N, Mastanjević K, Mastanjević K (2016) A survey of total β-glucan content in Croatian barley varieties. Cereal Research Communication 44: 650-657.
Narziss L (1999) Die Technologie der Malzbereitung. 7th ed. Stuttgart, Germany.
Bishop LR (1930) The nitrogen content and quality of barley. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 36: 352-369.
Havlová P, Lancova K, Váňová M, Havle J, Hajšlová J (2006) The effect of fungicidal treatment on selected quality parameters of barley and malt. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 1353-1360.
Varga E, Wiesenberger G, Hametner C, Ward TJ, Dong Y, Schöfbeck D, McCormick S, Broz K, Stückler R, Schuhmacher R, Krska R, Kistler HC, Berthiller F, Adam G (2015) New tricks of an old enemy: isolates of Fusarium graminearum produce a type A trichothecene mycotoxin. Environmental Microbiology 17: 2588-2600.
Varga E, Malachova A, Schwartz H, Krska R, Berthiller F (2013) Survey of deoxynivalenol and its conjugates deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside and 3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol in 374 beer samples. Food Additives and Contaminants A 30: 137-146.
Dupire S (2003) Mycotoxins and other contaminants in the malting and brewing industries. European brewery convention congress, Proceedings, Dublin, Nurnberg, Germany: Fachverlag Hans Carl, CD ROM, Contribution 129.
Boivin P (2005) Emergent mycotoxins in malting barley. Proceeding of the Congress - European Brewery Convention. Fachverlag Hans Carl.
Malachová A, Varga E, Schwartz-Zimmermann HE, Berthiller F (2015) Analytical strategies for the determination of deoxynivalenol and its modified forms in beer: a mini review. Kvasny prum 6: 46-50.
Cavaglieri LR, Keller KM, Pereya CM, Gonzalez Pereya M, Alonso VA, Rojo FG, Dalcero AM, Rosa CAR (2009) Fungi and natural incidence of selected mycotoxins in barley rootlets. Journal of Stored Products Research 45: 147-150.
Krstanović V, Mastanjević K, Velić N, Pleadin J, Perši N, Španić V (2015) The influence of Fusarium culmorum contamination level on deoxynivalenol content in wheat, malt and beer. Romanian Biotechnological Letters 20: 10901-10910.
Gonzalez Pereyra ML, Rosa CAR, Dalcero AM, Cavaglieri LR (2011) Mycobiota and mycotoxins in malted barley and brewer’s spent grain from Argentinean breweries. Letters in Applied Microbiology 53: 649-655.
Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Roberto IC (2006) Brewers’ spent grain: generation, characteristics and potential applications. Journal of Cereal Science 43: 1-14.
Ktenioudaki A, Chaurin V, Reis SF, Gallagher E (2012) Brewer’s spent grain as a functional ingredient for breadsticks. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition 47: 1765-1771.
Warth B, Sulyok M, Fruhmann P, Berthiller F, Schuhmacher R, Hametner C, Adam G, Fröhlich J, Krska R (2012) Assessment of human deoxynivalenol exposure using an LC-MS/MS based biomarker method. Toxicology Letters 211: 85-90.
Warth B, Sulyok M, Berthiller F, Schuhmacher R, Krska R (2013) New insights into the human metabolism of the Fusarium mycotoxins deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. Toxicology Letters 220: 88-94.